Skip to main content

2025-2026 Bernard Chernos Contest Details

How to Enter

Choose Your Question

01

Choose one of the prompts provided for the 2025-2026 Bernard Chernos Contest. (This year there is one option if you choose to submit an essay, and three options if you choose to submit a video.)

02

Choose Your Format

Write a 750-1,000 word essay OR record a 3-4 minute video.

03

Create Your Entry

Write your essay or record your video! Proof read! Fact check!

04

Submit!

Click the button below to submit your essay or video entry.

Click to Submit Your Entry

Deadline is Friday May 22, 2026 at 11:59PM EST!

Essay Question

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects the fundamental rights and freedoms of everyone in Canada. In this essay, you will explore how the Charter directly affects your community and how it intersects with real events.

Remember, this assignment is about YOUR understanding and YOUR perspective on rights and freedoms in Canada. The most important part is your authentic engagement with these concepts and how they apply to your life as a young Canadian.

1. Choose a Right or Freedom –> Select one section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (e.g., equality rights, mobility rights, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, etc).

2. Local Connection –> Identify a specific example from your city/town or school where this right has been relevant in the last five years.  What happened? How was the chosen Charter right applied or debated?  Who benefited (or did not benefit) from this right? Did this Charter right conflict with another Charter right or with someone else’s freedoms?  Was the Charter right limited in any way, and if so, was this limit reasonable? How does this example connect to the broader Canadian context?

3. Reflection –> If this right didn’t exist, how would your daily life be different? Be specific. What did your specific example show you about the importance of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

*Note: please keep the geographic range as local as possible; the example should be from your school or your community. It does not have to be an explicit Charter issue, but should involve one or more of the rights that are identified in the Charter.  For example: has your school made new rules around hate speech and political symbols? This would engage with Section 2 b) of the Charter, Freedom of Expression.  Does your local hockey arena prioritize male over female hockey for prime booking slots? This would engage with Section 15, equality rights.  These are just hypothetical examples, but we want you to engage with local issues, and analyze how the Charter is relevant.

Questions for video entries (pick one of these 3 options and submit a 3-4 minute video)

Option One

The Ministry of Education in the province of New Island has announced a new initiative to help prevent teenagers from dropping out of high school.  They will use an artificial intelligence tool to determine who is most at risk of dropping out, and provide additional supports to the students that are identified.  Data that will be inputted into the AI system to determine a student’s risk of dropping out include, but are not limited to: the distance between a student’s home and their school; how often a student’s family has moved in the past several years; parents’ education levels; and behavioural indicators such as absences, lateness, and misbehaviour.  Do you support this proposal? Why or why not? What are the potential benefits and risks of this policy? What Charter rights and freedoms are at play?

Option Two

Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, also known as the Notwithstanding Clause, gives parliaments in Canada the ability to override certain portions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for 5-year terms. With reference to specific cases, comment on the increasingly frequent use of the Notwithstanding Clause and its implications for the protection of Charter rights in Canada. Why are governments using the Notwithstanding Clause more often? How does this affect the human rights landscape in Canada, and democracy more broadly?  What changes, if any, would you recommend to the rules surrounding the use of the Notwithstanding Clause?

Option Three (same as essay question, but can be submitted in video format)

1. Choose a Right or Freedom –> Select one section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (e.g., equality rights, mobility rights, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, etc).

2. Local Connection –> Identify a specific example from your city/town or school where this right has been relevant in the last five years.  What happened? How was the chosen Charter right applied or debated?  Who benefited (or did not benefit) from this right? Did this Charter right conflict with another Charter right or with someone else’s freedoms?  Was the Charter right limited in any way, and if so, was this limit reasonable? How does this example connect to the broader Canadian context?

3. Reflection –> If this right didn’t exist, how would your daily life be different? Be specific. What did your specific example show you about the importance of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

*Note: please keep the geographic range as local as possible; the example should be from your school or your community. It does not have to be an explicit Charter issue, but should involve one or more of the rights that are identified in the Charter.  For example: has your school made new rules around hate speech and political symbols? This would engage with Section 2 b) of the Charter, Freedom of Expression.  Does your local hockey arena prioritize male over female hockey for prime booking slots? This would engage with Section 15, equality rights.  These are just hypothetical examples, but we want you to engage with local issues, and analyze how the Charter is relevant.

What You Need to Know

Requirements

  • Essay: 750 – 1000 words (double-spaced, size 12 font, in either Word or PDF format). Must be submitted individually. The emphasis is on originality and we strongly discourage the use of AI; any use of AI must be disclosed.
  • Video: 3-4 minute Youtube Video + your script (double-spaced, size 12 font, in either Word or PDF format).
  • Can be submitted individually or done in groups of 2 or 3 (3 students per video is the maximum.)
  • You must be in Grades 9-12 in the Canadian school system. Home school entries are welcomed.  We also welcome and encourage entries in French.
  • Video entries must be uploaded to Youtube as “Unlisted” so only the people you share the link with can see your entry.
  • DON’T be late! Just like when filing court documents, the deadline is our cut-off.
  • Do NOT include your name, school, grade or course in/on your entry itself. We collect this information in the entry form. Our judges mark the entries without knowing who you are, or what grade or school you are from.
  • DO cite your sources! Citations are required whenever you include direct quotes or statistics, or you paraphrase or adopt someone else’s idea. The last page of your essay or rant script should be a citations list (not included in your word count).

Basic Elements

All entries should cover at least these basic elements:

Introduction
  • What is the question you are addressing?
  • What is at stake and why should people care about this issue?
  • What rights and freedoms are at play here?
  • State your thesis, where do you stand on the issue?
  • Consider introducing some strong counter-arguments so you can refute them later.
  • Consider adding a rhetorical device.
Body
  • Now convince us to agree with you by explaining your position and giving us your supporting arguments.
  • Remember, when rights and freedoms conflict, there are many positions one can take. Different stakeholders may be affected by the issues differently so show us you have thought about the problem from multiple perspectives.
  • Address any counter-arguments you raised in your introduction, and provide arguments to refute them. This will help convince us that you have carefully considered and ultimately resolved possible weaknesses in your position.
  • Where possible, support your arguments with evidence from secondary sources (make sure you cite them!).
Conclusion
  • Sum it all up and reinforce your thesis by re-stating the position you are advocating for.
  • Briefly paraphrase your main points but don’t re-state them in full.
  • Consider closing with your own ideas about possible compromises to bring the opposing sides closer together and resolve these issues. Or offer some food for thought with a pithy statement reminding us about the importance of these issues.
  • Research and apply the law! Our The Fundamentals of our Fundamental Freedoms is an excellent primer on conflicts of rights and freedoms. Our Acorn Test, a simplified version of the Supreme Court’s Oakes Test, you help you assess the reasonability of limits to Charter rights or freedoms.
  • Ask a teacher or another supporter to review your entry, check for errors, and provide feedback.

Video Tips

  • Watch a Rick Mercer rant here (yes it’s old, but still a masterclass in rants)
  • Students are encouraged to be creative in video entries; Rick Mercer-style rants are suggested, but we welcome creativity and originality in your videos, as long as the video features your original opinions/arguments about the topic that you selected.  Not comfortable in front of the camera? We welcome creative video formats, including animation.
  • Students may submit videos individually, or in groups of 2 or 3 (3 is the maximum number of students per video entry).
  • Stick to the 3 to 4 minute time limit. ENTRIES OVER THE TIME LIMIT WILL BE DISQUALIFIED. This roughly translates to a 500-700 word script.
  • DO protect your privacy. DON’T film in locations that make it easy to identify you, your home address, your school, or any other personal information.
  • You will need access to a Youtube channel to enter. Make sure you upload your video as “unlisted” NOT “private” or “public”.
  • Be concise! You will not be engaging if you simply write an essay and read it on camera. Include all the necessary content, but make your point in as few words as possible.
  • Use a cell phone, a laptop/tablet, or digital camera, etc. If you are ranting on the move, get a friend to record you.
  • Get your volume, pacing, tone, and style right. We need to hear and understand you.
  • Add animation, music, or other effects if they add to your rant.
  • Use appropriate but engaging language.

Marking Rubric

en_CAEnglish (Canada)