Choose one of the three questions provided for the 2024-2025 Bernard Chernos Contest.
2024-2025 Bernard Chernos Contest Details
How to Enter
01
Choose Your Question
02
Choose Your Format
Write a 750-1,000 word essay OR record a 3-4 minute video rant.
03
Create Your Entry
Write your essay! Record your video! Proof read! Fact check!
04
Submit!
Click the button below to submit your entry.
Deadline is May 23, 2025 at 11:59PM EST!
The Questions
Option One
According to the Canada Elections Act, the current federal voting age in Canada is set at 18 years old, but a group of young people are challenging this age-based restriction in court and advocating to lower the voting age to sixteen. Among other arguments, they have highlighted that denying younger Canadians the right to vote violates Section 3 (voting rights) and Section 15 (equality rights) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Where do you stand on the issue of lowering the voting age from 18 to 16? Back up your position with relevant evidence, address counter-arguments, and evaluate the merits of their legal arguments.
Option Two
Your public high school has recently banned the wearing of any political symbols on school grounds, citing potential hate speech as the reason. Your student council organizes a sit-in at the principal’s office to protest this ban. The school’s administration decides to suspend all participants from the sit-in and threatens to expel students who continue to protest the political symbols ban. What Charter rights are at play here? Does the ban on political symbols violate students’ freedom of expression? Should students be allowed to protest the ban?
Option Three
Bail is the term used for when a person in Canada charged with a criminal offence is allowed to remain in the community, rather than in detention, while they wait for their trial. People facing criminal charges have the right to a bail hearing, which is also called a “show cause” hearing because this is when the prosecution can “show a cause” for why that person should be incarcerated as they wait for their trial. At this hearing, a judge or a justice of the peace weighs various factors in making this decision. The burden is usually on the government to show why an accused person should be denied bail. However, the Premier of the province of New Island (NI) is pushing for changes to the bail system that would make it so that the burden would shift to the accused to show why they should be released. Why might the Premier be asking for these changes? What does a judge or justice of the peace need to consider in making their determination? What effect(s) will these proposed changes have? Do you support the Premier’s proposal? Why or why not? What Charter rights and freedoms are at play?
Please refer to our NEW Additional support document to help you get started with your essay or video on any of these topics!
What You Need to Know
Requirements
- Essay: 750 – 1000 words (double-spaced, size 12 font, in either Word or PDF format)
- Video rant: 3-4 minute Youtube Video + your script (double-spaced, size 12 font, in either Word or PDF format)
- You must be in Grades 9-12 in the Canadian school system. Home school entries are welcomed.
- Video entries must be uploaded to Youtube as “Unlisted” so only the people you share the link with can see your entry.
- DON’T be late! Just like when filing court documents, the deadline is our cut-off.
- Do NOT include your name, school, grade or course in/on your entry itself. We collect this information in the entry form. Our judges mark the entries without knowing who you are, or what grade or school you are from.
- DO cite your sources! Citations are required whenever you include direct quotes or statistics, or you paraphrase or adopt someone else’s idea. The last page of your essay or rant script should be a citations list (not included in your word count).
Basic Elements
All entries should cover at least these basic elements:
Introduction
- What is the question you are addressing?
- What is at stake and why should people care about this issue?
- What rights and freedoms are at play here?
- State your thesis, where do you stand on the issue?
- Consider introducing some strong counter-arguments so you can refute them later.
- Consider adding a rhetorical device.
Body
- Now convince us to agree with you by explaining your position and giving us your supporting arguments.
- Remember, when rights and freedoms conflict, there are many positions one can take. Different stakeholders may be affected by the issues differently so show us you have thought about the problem from multiple perspectives.
- Address any counter-arguments you raised in your introduction, and provide arguments to refute them. This will help convince us that you have carefully considered and ultimately resolved possible weaknesses in your position.
- Where possible, support your arguments with evidence from secondary sources (make sure you cite them!).
Conclusion
- Sum it all up and reinforce your thesis by re-stating the position you are advocating for.
- Briefly paraphrase your main points but don’t re-state them in full.
- Consider closing with your own ideas about possible compromises to bring the opposing sides closer together and resolve these issues. Or offer some food for thought with a pithy statement reminding us about the importance of these issues.
- Research and apply the law! Our The Fundamentals of our Fundamental Freedoms is an excellent primer on conflicts of rights and freedoms. Our Acorn Test, a simplified version of the Supreme Court’s Oakes Test, you help you assess the reasonability of limits to Charter rights or freedoms.
- Ask a teacher or another supporter to review your entry, check for errors, and provide feedback.
Video Tips
- Watch a Rick Mercer rant here (yes its old, but still a masterclass in rants)
- Stick to the 3 to 4 minute time limit. ENTRIES OVER THE TIME LIMIT WILL BE DISQUALIFIED. This roughly translates to a 500-700 word script.
- DO protect your privacy. DON’T film in locations that make it easy to identify you, your home address, your school, or any other personal information.
- You will need access to a Youtube channel to enter. Make sure you upload your video as “unlisted” NOT “private” or “public”.
- Be concise! You will not be engaging if you simply write an essay and read it on camera. Include all the necessary content, but make your point in as few words as possible.
- Use a cell phone, a laptop/tablet, or digital camera, etc. If you are ranting on the move, get a friend to record you.
- Get your volume, pacing, tone, and style right. We need to hear and understand you.
- Add animation, music, or other effects if they add to your rant.
- Use appropriate but engaging language.
Marking Rubric
- Refer to this marking rubric for essays and marking rubric for videos as you create your submissions so that you know exactly what the judges will be looking for when they evaluate your entries.